A few minutes shy of two hours ago, I started reading a FREAKING long article that Marci posted on her blog. I didn't have any interruptions, it's just long and I'm a slow reader but I figured I need a good political read. The link: http://pewforum.org/events/?EventID=148 Because I anticipate my response to and thoughts about this topic will be even more lengthy than the article, I opted to create a post on my blog. We all know I LOVE to tout my opinion and have discussions regarding most things in life. I would first like to present a few of the thoughts that crossed my mind as I read the article, many of which have nothing to do with politics, but more religion, and then I will respond to some of the questions Marci asked on her blog. - I thought it was interesting that they stated twice the Church almost went down: the introduction of polygamy and the dissolution of polygamy, but of course it didn't.
- I feel that Mormons had every right to not trust the government due to the lack of help and support (or should I say non-existence of help?) during the times they were persecuted.
- I enjoyed the point Bushman made about the need for Romney to use 'American' and not 'Mormon' language, although the messages could be very similar.
- I really don't understand why people are caught up with Mormons being obligated to the prophet (the exmple used was Smoot being obligated to President Joseph F. Smith). Situations such as this frustrate me because I realize people don't understand Mormons and if they did, they would not make silly claims like this.
- Somewhat related to my last thought, if people are really concerned about Romney "taking orders" from Salt Lake City, they don't understand our Church. Our Doctrine is for us to follow, but never have I felt 'forced' into obeying. I was raised by parents who taught me right from wrong, from the teachings provided from the Church, and then I was able to exercise agency and make my own decisions. I believe this is how the Gospel is supposed to be implemented into our lives and I am sure Romney's decisions are made based on his personal opinions influenced by what he feels is best.
- Some people get into our deep doctrine and get caught up in it... I still don't see how these types of things would negatively influence, or influence at all, a president of our country.
- There was talk of Romney lacking capacity to serve as president and then women lacking capacity. Well, as a Mormon woman, I will tell you, in my VERY humble opinion, that Mormons DO NOT lack capacity, but MOST woman do. :) I'm sure I will develop many enemies with that comment, but women have such different emotional programming than men that leadership does not find conducive. I just don't think it's a good idea for the future of our country.
- I liked Bushman's point when he compared our miracles to other faith's because that is something I have never understood, why so many view our beliefs as far-fetched, but other churches are accepted without question.
- In regards to the whole convenience factor as a blame for changes that have come about from revelation (i.e. polygamy)... I feel that this can be misunderstood as a convenience when in reality God knew what was going on. He knew the appropriate time to provide us with these revelations and they happen when it is right. Through this, we have learned and will learn, patience and had to and will have to endure through trials.
- I get so frustrated when people read about or hear of ONE person's story regarding Mormons and they base their entire opinion of our Church on that. In general, Mormons are good, nice, friendly, accepting, hardworking, religious, thoughtful and honest people.
- People act as if our Church is so 'binding', I believe was the word used, in contrast to let's say the Catholics only offering "suggestions". I think that within our Church, somethings are required (living the Law of Chastity, living the Word of Wisdom, living the Law of Tithing, etc.) to be in good standing. If these are followed, our lives will be blessed. These things are mostly black and white and are not really up for interpretation. However, things such as appropriate Sabbath activities, movies we watch, and things like that require our judgment. We are given suggestions and guidelines for these types of things and then we are required to use pray to determine what we feel is the best way to act in each of these situations. One problem I have seen with other churches is their tolerance when their followers use personal judgment to change the "requirements". For example, premarital sex. The Catholic church teaches this to be a sin; however, a Catholic I know told me when I asked her about it, "Yeah, you aren't supposed to, but since everyone pretty much does it, they don't do anything about it." Perhaps this is why the world sees Mormonism as binding: there is discipline if you go against these types of commandments.
- I am always shocked to see so many various perceptions of the LDS Church. Part of the problem is we tell people things and they don't believe us. Like that we are Christians, some people just refuse to believe it, even though Christ truly is the center of our religion.
- Extremists make us look crazy. An extremist in any group can result in a crazy reputation. Look at the extremists in the Middle East (suicide bombers). People that live their religion over there in a moderate way are not considered a threat, just as those who live Mormonism moderatly are not considered crazy (for the most part). I do not mean living the commandments moderately, just Mormonism moderately.
- I do not think Romney's campaign will destroy Mormonism, not even close. I believe it will continue to help the world understand our religion and while I understand not everyone will believe, once they understand, they will accept us as "normal". Sure, we may see more public criticsm of our beliefs through comments and/or questions to Romney, but from history we learn that this strengthens us.
Okay, now onto the questions and more of the political meat:
Is America ready for a Mormon president? No, absolutely not. Until people are willing to take the time to understand us, they won't be. People think our religion is such a mystery and sometimes they refuse to listen to answers and responses we have to their questions. I have seen that as more and more people have interactions with more and more LDS people, they are realizing we aren't quite the freaks they might have thought of us as before. However, as Bushman stated, if Romney is able to sell his character (much of which has ironically been shaped, I'm sure, by his Gospel upbringing), I think he has a chance. I really think that if he was the same exact person without the label of Mormon, he'd have an excellent chance at the Presidency... and that is sad, but true.
Does Mitt have what it takes? I think Romney has what it takes to be the President. I think having a belief in God and being able to rely on His strength and help is very helpful and sometimes essential to hold such a position. I also think having a President that knows strong families are vital to strong communities and in turn a strong nation would really help this Country. I think he has the emotional strength required to stand up for what he thinks is best for the Country, despite public opinion. And finally, his sister was in our Ward in California and she's an amazing person... so he couldn't have fallen too far off the tree. HA! :)
Is the Mormon heritage too much of a mystery for people to trust? I do think Mormon heritage is too much of a mystery for people to trust. However, I think if Romney paints a picture of him being an ideal Presidential candidate that is a Mormon vs. a Mormon running for President, the people might be able to look past this. There are just a lot of very untrue things said about our Church and although we try to set people straight, some enjoy believing the untrue things. After all, they are usually more entertaining. Plus, it seems like regardless of what we tell people, they like to believe the things non-Mormons say. Which is interesting, if a Math teacher was answering your Math question and the English teacher gave you a different answer, I'm sure we'd all believe the Math teacher.
What do you think about Mitt's platform? I think he has very eloquently responded to very controversial issues. From the first time I saw him respond to questions in an interview, I have been impressed with the way he words his answers. He really always seems to have the perfect answer. I am not super wrapped up in the candidates' platforms, but just looking on his website and what I've heard about him, he has some fantastic ideas and goals... we just need to know how he plans to fulfill these ideas. For example, healthcare, he claims we need to revamp the market. Theoretically, great idea, realistically, VERY difficult task. But I guess the details come later. I also think he has the ability to appeal to all those hanging out in the middle. I don't know that he will capture the far rights or lefts, but there are lots in the middle that I can see agreeing with his ideas and focus... if only they can look past that "terrible" affiliation with Mormons. :)
One last thought: I don't think America is ready for a Mormon president, but I think they are less ready for a woman president (or maybe that is wishful thinking because I am honestly terrified of having a female as our president... I'm so glad I'm a girl so I can say that). Anyway, if it's Clinton vs. Romney, I'm pretty sure he'll win. But I think it will be Guiliani vs. Clinton and Guiliani will take it, but my opinion may change as the campaigning continues.
You think this was long? Try reading the full article!! And if anyone seriously read all that, you must not have a life. J/K Hopefully it at least gets one award: Most Boring Blog EVER! I love it.